Looking at a looming default Updated: Thursday, October 17, 2013 KALAMAZOO, Mich. (NEWSCHANNEL 3) - We're 10 days along in the partial government shutdown, and if this goes on for another week, our Treasury Secretary Jacob Lew says we, as a country, will no longer be able to pay all of our bills.What does that mean for our financial security?Some in Congress say it really wouldn't amount to much. Most economists, on the other hand, say it could spark global economic chaos.Tonight in Tom's Corner, Tom Van Howe says if he were a betting man, he'd put his money on those who deal in numbers every day.=====================If I was going to have heart surgery, I’m fairly certain I’d want the guy holding the scalpel to be someone who does nothing but heart surgeries. A guy who could almost do it in his sleep.And so it is with our government and our economy.So if I hear Congressman Justin Amash of Grand Rapids—and only Mr. Amash—say, "there's no way we'll default on October 17. We have enough money to make interest payments. The real question is how do we restructure our government so we don't keep hitting the debt ceiling?"He sounds pragmatic, confident, and unconcerned.And there are others in congress who say "not to worry;" that if we have to start cherry picking for a while, to choose who we're going to pay and who we're not, so what?Confident and reassuring.Setting aside the fact Congress has a constitutional responsibility to pay who we owe—on time—there are whole bushel baskets full of economists who are saying loudly and repeatedly that the impact of default could be calamitous; not just for us, but for the world.I know there's a widely-held, cynical assumption that if you ask 20 economists the same question, you may get 20 different answers. And on some matters that may be true.But this time around they're pretty much shouting with one voice. And they're telling Congress to get its act together.Since cherry picking seems acceptable for the moment, let me cherry pick a few.Gerald Epstein is an economist at the University of Massachusetts. "A default," he says, "will make the Lehman Brothers bankruptcy look like a cakewalk."Everybody knows who Warren Buffett is. He may not be an economist but he gets a free pass because he understands money as few others do. "Default," he said, "would be like a nuclear bomb - too horrible to use."And there's Tim Bitsberger, a former Treasury official under George W. Bush. "If we miss an interest payment, it would blow Lehman Brothers out of the water."And this from Bloomberg news—it would be "an economic calamity like none the world has seen."There is a FOX News economist, Peter Morici, who thinks default would be the best thing that could ever happen to the United States, but his evaluation gets neutered by the sheer weight of the other side.At stake is the perception the world has of us. That perception has already been scarred a little by the government shutdown.But U.S. Treasury Bonds are thought of as the world's primary risk-free asset.That rock-solid confidence, despite our $17 trillion deficit, is what has made the dollar the world's most widely-used currency.If we fail to make payments on those bonds, the perception of us as the world's richest and most stable country will take a dive, along with anyone willing to buy a little slice of America’s debt.And its beyond my perception that the right wing of the Republican party would be willing to carry the specter of of default, with all of its dark possibilities, to the brink or beyond because it doesn't like Obamacare.And if Justin Amash and his friends are so willing to reject the warnings of economists all over the country, maybe they'll listen to two organizations that have long supported conservative politics: the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers.In letters written a few days ago, both are urging Congress to rise above their differences and do what's right for the country.Raise the debt limit. And do it now.I couldn't say it any better myself.In this corner...I'm Tom Van Howe.